Nancy Pelosi Announces Formal Impeachment Inquiry into President Trump

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is scheduled to meet with six House committee chairmen who are leading investigations into President Donald Trump, ahead of a full caucus meeting to discuss next steps, according to Democratic sources.

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday announced a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, a dramatic and historic move that comes as the President faces outrage over reports that he pressured a foreign leader in an effort to target a political rival.

The announcement marks the most direct step taken by the House Democratic leader to embrace impeachment proceedings and is a significant escalation in the fight between House Democrats and the President.

“The actions of the Trump presidency revealed the dishonorable fact of the President’s betrayal of his oath of office, betrayal of our national security and betrayal of the integrity of our elections,” Pelosi said in a brief speech in the Capitol. “Therefore, today, I am announcing the House of Representatives moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry.”

The House speaker, who has long pushed to keep her caucus away from the politically divisive issue, is signaling that she’s responding to the seismic shift among Democratic members, following Trump’s admission of discussing Vice President Joe Biden and his son in his phone call with the Ukrainian President. Dozens of House Democrats — many from moderate or Trump-won districts — have announced their support for an impeachment inquiry over the past 48 hours.

In advance of that statement, Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer also announced plans to vote on a resolution of disapproval on Wednesday for allegations “that the President of the United States sought to enlist a foreign government to interfere in our democratic process by investigating one of his political rivals — and may have used the withholding of Congressionally-appropriated foreign assistance days earlier as intimidation.” Their statement did not mention impeachment.

Pelosi consulted Tuesday afternoon with the six House Democratic leaders to discuss their presentation to the caucus later in the day, Democratic sources familiar with the issue say. In that closed-door meeting before her public announcement, Pelosi said the six chairmen will continue to investigate under a powerful new umbrella of an impeachment inquiry.

A separate source in the room said the speaker added, “Here we are. A moment of truth. Truth is what this has been about all along.” She said, “The DNI has chosen to break the law. The law is clear” adding, “This is a betrayal of our national security. A betrayal of our election.”

“He’s taken it to another level of betrayal therefore we’re moving forward with another level of inquiry,” Pelosi said.

At an Atlantic Ideas Festival event in Washington on Tuesday, Pelosi declined to weigh in on specifics when asked about impeachment.

“It’s really sad to think that our President would perform an impeachable offense,” Pelosi said at the event. “It’s hard to say you’ve gotten to that place. But what would be an impeachable offense would be that which is proven in an investigation.”

Behind the scenes, Pelosi is encouraging members of her caucus to state their impeachment position now in order to show there is a groundswell in the caucus. She is also conveying that message to freshmen.

Tide changing for Pelosi allies and vulnerable House freshmen

Civil rights icon Rep. John Lewis on Tuesday announced his support for impeachment proceedings, arguing that “now is the time to act” and any delay “would betray the foundation of our democracy.”

“We will never find the truth unless we use the power given to the House of Representatives and the House alone to begin an official investigation as dictated by the Constitution,” the Georgia Democrat said in a speech on the House floor. “The future of our democracy is at stake.”

Some of Pelosi’s closest allies, including House Reps. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut and Debbie Dingell of Michigan, have signaled their support for impeachment proceedings — a significant indicator that the speaker could be moving closer to backing the divisive political procedure.

Another crucial development has been multiple high profile freshmen Democrats in districts Trump won in 2016 either coming out publicly to fully endorse the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry or at least opening the door to proceedings, citing Trump’s actions as forcing them to act.

One of those freshman Democrats, Rep. Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey, stressed on CNN “New Day” Tuesday that “none of us ran on impeaching the President.” But she argued that the allegation that Trump might have tried leveraging foreign military aid to advance his reelection efforts was “just a line that I think was too much for all of us.”

Pelosi has cited the House members in GOP-leaning districts as part of her hesitance to embrace impeachment, and the groundswell of statements over the past 48 hours could signal a tipping point in the political calculus.

“If investigations confirm recent reports, these actions represent impeachable offences that threaten to undermine the integrity of our elections and jeopardize the balance of power within the federal government,” Rep. Haley Stevens of Michigan said in a statement Tuesday. Stevens had told CNN last month that she had “mixed reviews from the people of my district” on the issue of whether to move forward with impeachment proceedings.

So far, as many as 161 House Democrats have publicly stated their support for an impeachment inquiry into Trump, according to a CNN count, and that doesn’t include the House Democrats who’ve said in recent days that the President’s behavior is a turning point in Democrats’ oversight into the administration.

Pelosi has, for months, resisted pursuing impeachment because she has sought to protect vulnerable Democrats in GOP-leaning districts who could face voter backlash.

Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, a member of House Judiciary, told CNN on Tuesday morning that he believes articles of impeachment are “inevitable” and said there’s a “growing clamor throughout the Democratic caucus” to deal with Trump’s “reckless and lawless” behavior.

Some holdouts remain

But some vulnerable Democrats in 2020 are still treading cautiously on the issue.

Rep. Ben McAdams of Utah told CNN on Tuesday that he’s “considering” impeachment, but didn’t want to discuss the issue further.

“Before making any judgments, I want to know the facts of what occurred between the President and Ukraine,” McAdams said. “I share Sen. (Mitt) Romney’s view that If the President used his position to pressure a foreign power to dig up dirt on a rival for his own personal gain, it would be deeply troubling. I believe it would be a betrayal of the loyalty owed to our country and the Constitution.”

Rep. Max Rose, another endangered House Democrat, told CNN that he has not moved off his opposition to impeachment, but argued that “we have to get to the facts” of the allegations.

“It is impossible to not take these allegations seriously. It is a national security matter,” the New York Democrat said Tuesday on Capitol Hill, adding, “It’s incredibly serious … what I’m not going to do is jump to make another declaration.”

Asked if that meant he is opposed to moving ahead on impeachment, Rose said, “My current position right now is clear, but that is not a justification to not take these points as seriously as possible.”

CNN previously reported that Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a July 25 call to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, according to a person familiar with the situation.

There has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden.

That call was also part of a whistleblower complaint submitted to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, which hasn’t been shared with lawmakers despite calls from Democrats.

Trump acknowledged on Sunday that he discussed the former Vice President Joe Biden in a phone call over the summer with Ukraine’s president, but denied doing anything improper.

CNN confirmed that Trump asked his acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to put a hold on millions in military aid to Ukraine roughly one week before a call with Zelensky, two senior administration officials said on Monday. The Washington Post first reported this.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

11 comments

  • Rusty Knyffe

    FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Speaker Pelosi? It’s time for you to step down and gather up all of your wretched followers, resign your public servant offices, admit to your machinations, and get to rehab, ASAP.

    The fourth attempt is another FAIL.

  • Mopar Driver (@RustyMopars)

    Not since the civil war have so many nitwits in our country been against the President of the United States and done so much damage trying to undermine the good of the country , Abraham Lincoln was the fine man in charge then and I suspect in the future Trump will be held in high esteem for his eight years fight to run the USA in our modern era .

  • wnepee

    The hair plugs, eye tucks and false choppers won’t be enough to get old Joe over the finish line in 2020. The campaign will be a real life “Weekend At Bernie’s”.

  • Rusty Knyffe

    Yes, the WNEP troll has changed its identity, again, to continue working it’s sad little issues out through the internet.

    The Democrats have spent the last 3 years and millions of dollars, countless man-hours, and untold resources in an effort to bring President Trump down in glorious triumph. Don’t these people have legislation to see to? Why are these elected public servants wasting all of this time, money, and effort on ONE nefarious goal instead of seeing to the best interests of their constituents? And, how can their constituents NOT express outrage at such a flagrant waste???

    DELETE THAT, why not….

    • Rusty Knyffe

      To clarify: I hold no affiliation with any party and choose to vote using facts and figures rather than party-lines. I do not allow any entity to determine my views for me.

      What is going on is the foundation for generating a second civil uprising in this country that is based upon stuff and nonsense. I don’t particularly “like” our President, but he stepped into North Korea, increased employment for minorities at a percentage not seen in nearly 60 years, and he has put the best interests of our Nation before the fragile feelings of bleeding hearts and foolish children. Before being elected, he was beloved by the Democratic Party as a huge contributor and spokesperson.

      People need to get over themselves, stop paying heed to children like Thunbrg, and hold domestic terrorists (B.ELL.EMM, Anty-fah, and others) accountable and get down to the business of rebuilding this Nation. Look at what liberalism has done for California. Kinda neat to contemplate having tuberculosis, cholera, and every other medieval plague simmering in your own backyard, isn’t it?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.