Parents Challenge Arming Teachers in Tamaqua

TAMAQUA, Pa. -- A school district in Schuylkill County is facing a second lawsuit over its decision to arm teachers in the classroom.

First, it was the teachers' union and now parents of students are filing a lawsuit of their own.

Parents of students who attend schools in the Tamaqua Area School District are echoing a lawsuit filed in November by the teachers' union claiming the school's new policy to train and arm teachers inside the classroom is illegal.

Parents and members of anti-gun violence groups came together in downtown Tamaqua to talk about a lawsuit they filed Thursday against the Tamaqua Area School District.

"I just don't feel a teacher should have to pack and carry. I think a teacher's responsibility is to teach the students," said parent Holly Koscak.

Koscak and other parents are against the school's new policy to arm teachers inside the classroom.

The Tamaqua Education Association filed a similar suit in November, claiming the policy is illegal because state law only allows certified police officers or graduates of the Pennsylvania State Police Academy to carry firearms inside schools.

Their hope is that the lawsuit will cause the district to drop its policy and try other safety measures.

"Things like metal detectors at the school doors, if we have a trained resource officer. Now if all those things were still not working then maybe this is where we would get to, but the fact is that the district has not implemented those most basic things," said parent Liz Pinkey.

Members of the Tamaqua Area School Board, like Nick Boyle, who supports the policy, says those measures have failed.

"We looked at all of the previous shootings and incidents where we have failed, where the government has failed, where FBI has failed, and we end up having an active shooter. So, when we have a shooter in the building, how are we going to stop that shooter from killing more and more and more people?" Boyle said.

The Tamaqua Area superintendent said the district is not saying anything about either lawsuit at this time.

Parents speaking out about the policy, say they are not against someone with a firearm inside the school working to keep students safe. They just think it should not be a teacher or janitor.

"This is another hurdle that I think needs to be looked at much more closely and find alternative means and I think a professional should be hired," Koscak said.

The parents who filed the lawsuit will wait for the school district's response.

Talkback 16 Online Discussion:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

5 comments

  • Lisa Marshinski

    Trained resource officers are wishful thinking. A supreme court ruling in 2005 states that police do not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm. And remember, when seconds count, these police are minutes away. NO ONE will protect your little angels more than the teachers who are with them every single day.

  • Lisa Marshinski

    The FASTER program saves lives. . look it up. I would rather see a sign saying “Staff heavily armed and trained. Any attempt to harm children will be met with deadly force” over your “Gun free zone”. Shooters don’t want any resistance, they want their name sprawled on main stream media glorifying them for days. Your ignorance will only get more children killed.