Sargent Guilty of Attempted Murder for Firing on Police in Walmart Parking Lot

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WILKES-BARRE -- The man accused of shooting at police in Luzerne County has been found guilty.

A jury found Scott Sargent guilty on most charges, including the most serious: attempted murder.

Sargent was on trial for an incident at a Walmart parking lot near Wilkes-Barre back in 2015.

Sargent testified Thursday that he thought two people followed him to the lot, so he fired two warning shots. He kept firing when his vehicle was struck by bullets, not realizing it was police.

Sargent told the jury he didn't mean to hurt anyone.

Jurors began deliberations around 1:30 p.m. Friday.

After all the arguments, it was up to the jurors to decide what would happen to the Schuylkill County man who opened fire on police in a Walmart parking lot in 2015.

The defense did their best to discredit witnesses and say that Sargent did not mean to injure anyone, arguing he did not mean to hit officers even though he had the chance saying he "did not intend to injure police."

Prosecutors painted Sargent as an active shooter, saying "he fired a series of shots against police before they returned fire."

No officer was injured in the shooting.

Prosecutors say Sargent knew he was shooting at police because officers were in full uniform and using marked police cars.

Assistant District Attorney Jarrett Ferentino called the officers heroes under fire.

Wilkes-Barre Township Officer Alan Gribble was one of the first to reach Sargent and take him down.

The defense argued Gribble wasn't shot because Sargent realized he was police.

Prosecutors said Sargent "didn't shoot Officer Gribble because Officer Gribble was quicker on the draw."

Sargent will be sentenced at a later date.


  • Carl Dryden

    defense attorney tried to discredit witness-wonderful- it is quite obvious that everyone in the world other that the attorney is an imbecile…..who is that lawyer anyway?? he needs to be in jail with his client

    • Mike

      Carl, criminals need competent representation. That’s how the legal system works. You don’t want a mistrial because of some defense attorney bungling through the process or trying to undermine their client. It’s their job. If the defendant is guilty, and obviously so, they’re often found as such. If it’s a public defender/court-appointed attorney, they’re doing their job and a civil service. If not, they’re still just doing their job. Instead of becoming knee-jerk outraged, perhaps you should inform yourself next time.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.