Death Decision for Jury in Officer Slaying

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SCRANTON -- The same jury that convicted a federal inmate of the brutal murder of a correctional officer in Wayne County now has to decide if he should be sentenced to death.

Federal prosecutors told the jury there are many reasons Jessie Con-ui should be punished by death.

In addition to what they call the cold-blooded murder of Correctional Officer Eric Williams, prosecutors were able to show evidence of the convicted killer's history of violence.

Eric Williams' parents were not in federal court in Scranton Monday for the start of the penalty phase.

Their son's killer, Jessie Con-ui, was an inmate at the federal prison near Waymart, already serving time for his role in a conspiracy to kill people in Arizona several years ago.

In opening statements, prosecutors pointed to the last decade and a half of Con-ui's life--years of havoc, violence, and brutality.

Robert Feitel reminded jurors of the video they saw two weeks ago showing the deadly 11-minute attack that took Williams' life in February 2013 inside the prison.

"If a picture is worth a thousand words," he told them, "then that video is worth one million words."

Con-ui's attorneys chose to try to humanize the gang member whose life is now the one at stake.

They showed photos of his family saying he came from poverty and a troubled upbringing and was in prison by the age of 19.

Speaking of whether Con-ui should get a death sentence, defense attorney David Ruhnke asked if the inmate's family deserves that.

"Can I do it to them? This is not a life to throw away. People care."

Officers from Arizona testified to threats and a stabbing at other prisons at the hands of Con-ui.

Con-ui was also sentenced to life in prison for a shooting death in Phoenix back in 2002.

The penalty phase is expected to take much longer than the guilt phase, perhaps weeks before the jury can decide if he deserves the death penalty in the murder of Eric Williams.


  • Mad Dog

    Dear god stop wasting money on this piece of trash. Why is there so much liberal nonsense when it comes to the death penalty? Many countries would’ve executed this scum years ago after his first murder. And what a dirtball lawyer … “he had a tough upbringing.” So did half of America! In a country where spending must be cut, and prisons are overcrowded, why don’t we start cleaning the slate? Give me permission and I’d have no problem offing this thug. And I would sleep just fine.

  • aleodawg94

    What is there to debate here? Who cares what his up bringing was, and who cares what his family feels. These penalty phases should go to the grieving family. Let them decide if this douche gets life or death. If it was a rabid dog we would put it down. This is a rabid animal it needs to get a needle stuck in it. And hopefully it is a botched one and he suffers for at least 11 minutes.

  • CeeMe

    Defense attorney is obviously nuts and would be the first one screaming for justice if this was his son.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.