Trump administration withdraws federal protections for transgender students

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Wednesday night withdrew Obama-era guidance on transgender bathroom use in public schools.

The announcement is a significant victory for opponents of the Obama administration’s guidelines who believe the federal government should never have gotten involved in the issue. Civil rights groups, meanwhile, decried the move as an attack on transgender children that denies them equal rights.

Last May, the departments of Education and Justice issued joint guidance directing schools to let transgender students use facilities that correspond with their gender identity. The “Dear Colleague” letter, addressed to school districts and colleges that receive federal funding, was based on the Obama administration’s interpretation of Title IX, the federal law that bans sex discrimination in schools, to include gender identity.

In a two-page “Dear Colleague” letter to public schools, the Trump administration said the existing guidance did not “contain extensive legal analysis or explain how the position is consistent with the express language of Title IX, nor did they undergo any formal public process.”

The letter — which does not offer new guidance but simply withdraws the Obama administration policy — says there must be “due regard” for the role of states and local school districts in shaping education policy in schools.

The letter also makes clear that the “withdrawal of these guidance documents does not leave students without protections from discrimination, bullying, or harassment.”

“As President Trump has clearly stated, he believes policy regarding transgender bathrooms should be decided at the state level,” the White House said in a statement. “The joint decision made today by the Department of Justice and the Department of Education returning power to the states paves the way for an open and inclusive process to take place at the local level with input from parents, students, teachers and administrators.”

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said the administration has “a responsibility to protect every student in America and ensure that they have the freedom to learn and thrive in a safe and trusted environment.

“This is not merely a federal mandate, but a moral obligation no individual, school, district or state can abdicate,” the statement continued. “At my direction, the department’s Office for Civil Rights remains committed to investigating all claims of discrimination, bullying and harassment against those who are most vulnerable in our schools.”

DeVos, however, was not originally on board with the plan, a source told CNN Wednesday.

Supreme Court poised to consider related case

In a separate letter, the deputy solicitor general informed the Supreme Court that the guidance had been withdrawn. The court is poised to consider the case of Gavin Grimm, a 17-year-old transgender male who wants to use the bathroom that corresponds to his gender identity.

Last April, a federal appeals court ruled in favor of Grimm, a Virginia resident, who fought the school board’s new policy at Gloucester High School that denied him access to the boys’ bathroom but allowed him the use of recently constructed single-stall unisex restrooms. In ruling for Grimm and against the school district, the court deferred to the Obama administration’s interpretation of Title IX.

In an interview with CNN last fall, Grimm said that he was just “another 17-year-old kid.”

“I have 17-year-old fears and worries and I have 17-year-old motivations, which is just to get out of high school and have fun with my friends and family. There’s just nothing about me that is predatory or dangerous, or warrants the kind of response I got from the community,” he said.

Arguments in the case are scheduled for March 28. While the Trump administration’s new guidance may not stop the case, it could give the justices an off-ramp to send the matter back to the lower court to consider the new guidance. The court could also decide to send the case back before arguments.

“Both parties will tell the court we think the court to decide the question,” said James Esseks,the director of the ACLU’s Lesbian Gay Bisexual and HIV Project and a lawyer for Grimm.

‘Not what Betsy wanted to do’

One source outside of government who said he’s familiar with DeVos’ thinking on the plans told CNN, “this is not what Betsy wanted to do.”

She communicated that first to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the source said. She was then summoned to the White House on Tuesday for a meeting with Sessions and President Donald Trump, where she was told to agree to the plans.

“It was the President’s decision,” the source said.

DeVos reminded Trump that both he and she had publicly promised to protect all students.

She felt that this was not in accordance with those promises. She did ask for additional language to put in the letter that affirmed that students would still be protected and the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights would investigate issues.

Her concern was that some people may interpret it as removing protections.

“When the President tells you to do something you don’t want to do, that is a hard spot to be in,” the source said.

Outrage from transgender advocacy groups

The Obama administration guidance was in response to questions from school districts about how to treat transgender students, based on best practices from schools across the country that have already taken up the issue.

“A school may not require transgender students to use facilities inconsistent with their gender identity,” the guidance read.

That guidance outraged Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led a charge on behalf of several states and won a nationwide injunction from a district court judge in Texas barring federal agencies from taking action against the schools that disagreed with the guidance.

Sarah Warbelow, legal director of Human Rights Campaign, said rescinding the guidance will lead to confusion among schools that look to the federal government for best practices, because the change does not affect existing federal law, only the Department of Education’s interpretation of it.

And Mara Keisling, the executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, told reporters the decision was “simply and dangerously wrong and incorrect.”

“Laws like Title IX are not state-by-state options, they are the responsibility of the federal government,” she said.


  • magicmikexxsm

    Trump administration withdraws federal protections for transgender students………………………………………………….
    Pretty soon we will be a society of all protected classes……when will we have white people protected class??????

    Trump is correct…and to the freaks who don’t know what they are, next time you need a bathroom look down between your legs, and use the one that correspond to what you have….

  • Lloyd Schmucatelli

    Like someone else says here, “It’s nice to see the adults back in charge.”

    Keep cleaning house buddy!!!

  • MMMM

    And what about the rights of the straight people that use the bathroom and someone from the opposite sex comes in? WHERE ARE MY RIGHTS!?

    • Smh

      Do you really want a gay man standing next to you at a urinal? Or a lesbian sharing a bathroom wit you? Hate to tell you but gay men could care less about straight men, and lesbians could care less about straight women. So I guess Obama was protecting you! Besides most of Megan’s list is heterosexual white men! Take a look!

      • WarningFakeNews

        The person commenting was talking about people of the OPPOSITE sex… but having said that…

        You said, “Hate to tell you but gay men could care less about straight men, and lesbians could care less about straight women” Well, no, that’s not entirely true. Having had a close friend who was gay, and since I’ve done an extensive amount of reading of material about gays by gays, “turning a straight man” for the first time is a huge turn on for many of them. They say it themselves. Look it up. Having a gay man at the urinal next to you? That’s life.

      • Smh

        Originally coming from a more populated area of this state, I can honestly say that my statement is correct. I’m glad you’re such an expert on gays having ONE gay friend, and doing your “extensive” and dug up up some books that of course would , of course prove a homophobe correct. I have personally known MANY gay individuals. Some were perverts, but the majority were very respectful. I have met more perverted straight men than gay.

      • WarningFakeNews

        I’ve read about 50 issues of “The Advocate”. Written by gays for gays. Not to many homophobes giving their viewpoints there. Anyhow, the current thing Milo got himself caught up in? Well known in the gay community and widely accepted by most. He was just saying that it was accepted as true, which is a fact. He was also disagreeing with it, in the process. Unfortunately, he is a conservative and stepped on the third rail. If he had been a liberal, all would be forgiven.

  • WarningFakeNews

    Rush called this right- “protections” is a euphemism for “regulations” Obama called these guidelines. Both of the lefts terms are to try and hide the fact that these are decrees from Obama, not laws, but as often the case, the effect of them is the same.

    More left doublespeak? Taxpayer funded projects are “investments”, liberals are “progressives”, and on and on. Don’t allow nicer terminology to force government control down our throats.

Comments are closed.