UPDATE: Supreme Court, Federal District Court Rule against GOP Challenge to New District Map

WASHINGTON D.C. — The Supreme Court has denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block new congressional maps that could tilt several key races in Democrats’ favor from being used in the midterm elections.

The court issued one sentence to reject the request. There were no noted dissents.

GOP leaders of the state House and Senate asked the court for an emergency stay blocking the implementation of the maps, which were unveiled last month by the state Supreme Court after it ruled that the previous maps had been gerrymandered in violation of Pennsylvania’s Constitution.

Lawyers for House Speaker Mike Turzai and Senate President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati argued that the state’s high court overstepped its authority in setting a deadline for lawmakers to draw new maps — and then, when the GOP-led Legislature missed that deadline, producing new maps drawn by an expert selected by the court.

National Republicans and Democrats are paying close attention to the Pennsylvania developments.

The new map drawn by the state Supreme Court would mean more historically Democratic electorates in three seats in the suburbs of Philadelphia, including one region largely represented by Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick and another represented in part by GOP Rep. Ryan Costello.

Republicans would also have a more difficult time holding the seats of retiring Reps. Pat Meehan and Charlie Dent under the new maps. Other districts — including one west of Pittsburgh — could become newly competitive.

President Donald Trump had urged the state Republicans to appeal.

“Hope Republicans in the Great State of Pennsylvania challenge the new ‘pushed’ Congressional Map, all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary,” Trump tweeted last week. “Your Original was correct! Don’t let the Dems take elections away from you so that they can raise taxes & waste money!”

The Supreme Court previously refused to step into the Pennsylvania case, and election law experts believe the latest filing with the Supreme Court is a long shot.

“Because this was a case decided under the state constitution by the state supreme court, the usual path for review of this case by the US Supreme Court is limited,” wrote Richard L. Hasen, an elections law expert at the University of California, Irvine.

Earlier Monday in a separate case, a three-judge panel also ruled against eight state Republican lawmakers.

A federal court has ruled against Republicans challenging a redrawn Pennsylvania congressional district map that will take effect in time for the state’s May primary.

The ruling comes after eight Republican state lawmakers in the state attempted to block the new map, which the Pennsylvania Supreme Court got rid of after determining its congressional districts were drawn to unfairly benefit Republicans.

Republicans in the Pennsylvania legislature challenged the new maps in federal court. The U.S. Supreme Court previously refused to hear a challenge to the state high court’s ruling that the previous maps were drawn in a way that violated the Pennsylvania constitution.

The new maps appear more compact and suburban than the existing district boundaries and an alternative that state legislative Republicans had submitted and one of those districts is now made up of just Montgomery County, a Democratic stronghold that the GOP had proposed dividing heavily.

The court ruled in January the current districts violated the state’s constitution.

Governor Tom Wolf rejected a proposed map that was created by the legislature, leading to the Supreme Court’s new version of the district map.

There are major changes to districts in our viewing area.

Republicans challenged the ruling saying the constitution gives lawmakers the job of drawing districts, not courts.

4 comments

  • Ginny Anderson

    Of course the liberal federal court will side with democrats. Winning at any cost is liberalisms motto. And since the courts are overwhelming liberal, well we all knew what the outcone would be.

    • Denny Nero

      A Ginny the U. S. Supreme Court has 5 justices appointed by Republicans (conservative) 4 justices appointed by Democrats (liberal as you call them). There were NO dissenting opinions, how can you say this is a federal liberal court? You are dumb!!!

Comments are closed.