School Closings And Delays

Plains Township Could Lose Millions If Part Of Casino Law Isn’t Rewritten

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

PLAINS TOWNSHIP -- Communities where Pennsylvania’s casinos are located could lose tens of millions of dollars, thanks to a state Supreme Court ruling.  The court decided Wednesday that part of the casino gaming law is unconstitutional.

“For the citizens of Plains Township, we have a $9 million budget, which over $3 million is generated from Mohegan Sun,” said Rob Sax, a township commissioner.

He says all of that money goes towards emergency services for things like equipment and salaries. Getting by without it could be a challenge.

“It certainly would be a big blow to the township and all municipalities that receive host community money,” said the township solicitor, Steve Menn.

A state Supreme Court justice wrote in an 18-page opinion that, “we are mindful that our decision may significantly affect many counties and municipalities that have ordered their affairs in reliance upon (the casino tax revenue ).” But the judge ruled that since taxes casinos pay are not uniform, the tax that goes to communities where casinos are located is unconstitutional.

Lawmakers like State Representative Aaron Kaufer are still digesting what the ruling means.

“Without this, the casinos maintain more money, there's less money coming back to our communities, less money coming back to our taxpayers,” he said.

Lawmakers have 120 days to rewrite part of that law that was ruled unconstitutional or those communities could lose that money. Representative Kaufer expects that the law will be rewritten in time.


  • Roy

    I wish the evil of gambling would be outlawed in our entire state. Gambling is sin, it is addictive, it destroys marriages and families and communities (just look at Atlantic city), it brings crime to that area. The end does not justify the means as people would say it adds revenue to the state. That is dirty money. Is that the kind of money we should get?

    • anonymous

      You can be addicted to literally anything, so that’s an invalid argument. Sins are not necessarily illegal, and irrelevant to governing bodies. People are going to gamble whether or not it is legal, so the state may as well get funds from it.

  • Henry the 1/8th

    Plains Township existed before the casino, and it shall continue to exist after they leave. Unless, of course the accomplish the unlikely and convince the Supreme Court to overturn their ruling for sake of municipal revenue.

Comments are closed.