No More “PPL” at Lake Wallenpaupack

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

The letters "PPL" have been plastered all around Lake Wallenpaupack for years.

The company built the lake in the 1920's to make hydroelectric power.

There is little indication of what if any changes might occur with the power company's deal other than a name change and folks around the lake hope that's all that changes.

Lake Wallenpaupack is a big lake by anyone's standards; 13 miles long, nearly 6,000 acres with public and private properties spread around 52 miles of shoreline.

At the northern end near Hawley sits a hydroelectric plant, producing at any one-time 44 megawatts of electricity.

Now the plant will be under a new name and a new company without a clear indication of what it will mean for Lake Wallenpaupack.

"At first a little leery, we hope everything remains the same as far as the structures," said Steve Gelderman of East Shore Lodging.

Gelderman is part of a group that's worked with PPL over the years to look out for businesses like his.

If and when the switch is made to Talen Energy, Gelderman and others said there's a lot at stake for dock owners and the overall lake community.

"Commercial business owners have built a good relationship up with PPL over the years so we hope that continues and not too many dramatic changes take place," added Gelderman.

PPL owns the lake and has the final say for all the docks and properties that are on the lake and the shore. That includes most everything used for fishing, swimming and boating, but the power company has had a lot to do with the water quality as well.

"They provide office space to us and significant financial contributions to management of the lake," said Nick Spinelli, Executive Director of Lake Wallenpaupack Watershed Management District which handles the lake's water quality.

Spinelli and others said a name change, from PPL to Talen Energy, may be the most noticeable change when the time comes.

"There are still a lot of people around here who call it PP&L, I think a name change is definitely going to be a major hurdle to get over and take some getting used to," said Spinelli.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission could approve the PPL deal within one year, according to a news release.

When it happens, officials at the power company said plants like the one at Lake Wallenpaupack may see few changes if any.

Other than the name and all those signs around the lake.


  • Barbara Mann

    Haven’t the people of Pa. learned their lessons form last winters electric rates from “start up companies”? Since the rate of political corruption is so high in this state there should be no change, especially since we want to maintain our watershed area and not create another amusement park with condos. We the people love the animals and want to maintain and conserve the environment. Talen Energy should go away before they have the chance to become another Enron and they create another disaster due to deregulation. THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEED TO STOP THEM. We the citizens need to get this stopped at once. On the Web you can read about how we have the most corrupt politicians per capita in the Nation. This report is world wide. In other words the stink of Pa. corruption has disgusted China and that’s pretty hard to do. We are in some ways worse than Texas and Florida. Do you really want that, if you’re not corrupt?

    • crackers81

      All very well said, but what does this have to do with the lake? PP&L could just as easily have decided to not fund the resources that keep the lake and surrounding country so beautiful. There’s no inherent reason to believe Talen Energy wont do the same. There’s a pressing need for energy companies to appear “green”, if not actually use clean technologies. This routinely results in local outdoors areas being financially sustained by said companies to keep up appearances. I’m not saying that’s a GOOD scenario, but it’s far from the worst, where the lake is concerned. How is this a matter for the FERC? How does higher electric prices translate into the lake being destroyed?

      You’re %100 correct about the genuinely disgusting degree to which state level corruption has poisoned our civic and financial lives in the common wealth, but your points don’t hold water in the context of conservation in this specific instance.

Comments are closed.